Makin’ some little changes - layout on the posts and what not will be a bit off kilter, if not completely unbearable ;), ... haven’t done any browser testing … sorry if it’s your first time here! Working on it though...!

I got results from sending in my water samples to AWT… and… the review is mixed. Mixed enough that I’m going to buy a couple more mail in packages, but enough that I am with others in questioning the procedures used and results received from aquariumwatertesting.com.
Last Sunday I sat down and ran a whole battery of tests on my tank water. It was the first time I’d done it in at least a month (aside from quick daily checks of alkalinity). Everything else seemed to be more or less normal with exception of a couple parameters…
So, from all the tests, my results follow. AWT’s are noted as well:
Alkalinity (kH)
Magnesium (Mg)
Nitrate (NO3)
Potassium (K)
Iodine (Io)
Calcium (Ca)
Phosphate (PO4)
And that’s all I test for. They did provide other results on Silicates, Copper, Molybdenum, an others (just head to their site for a whole list), but I don’t really care. If the tank had really high copper, I think the coral would have mentioned something long ago. I do not understand the role Molybdenum plays enough to worry about it now, but it did make a kick ass lubricant for pinewood derby car wheels when I was a Cub Scout. They wonder why my cars would never lose…
I do wish I had another Ca kit on hand. I knew about some discrepancies between home kits and AWT’s Ca results (Reef Central thread here) beforehand, so in all honesty, I didn’t really care - Ca is easy to test for, and easy to adjust. I wonder how the hell I let it drop to 300, but that’s an easy adjustment. It would be a boon to their service if there were less discrepancy (low result seems par for the course).
It was great that the iodine came back within the same range the SeaChem reads. Not a huge fan of SeaChem kits in general, either based on past use with other kits, or just the whole thing with the little tray. As far as I know, hobbyist test kits for Io are dodgy at best, so this result was nice too see.
The one parameter that’s really bothering me is the potassium (K). I ran 3 tests with the Fauna Marin kit, and came back with 425ish to 450…ish, a little high, every time. I also kept a sample of the water I sent in, just in case, and tested it 3 times since I got the results - 425 to 450… ish. It’s a little hard to read, but I find it very hard to believe that the potassium in my tank is under 200. Fauna Marin’s MinS additive, one of their main components to the basic system, lists Potassium Chloride as one of the ingredients. Given that I’ve been dosing Min S every day for the last few months, it’s a little curious. I also fail to mention I haven’t noticed any signs of K depletion commonly noted.
All in all, it’s OK. The idea of the service is great. They mail a packet quickly, and the turn around time from when sample is sent in until results received is very good. I am going to order a few more “submission packets”, or whatever they call them, and I’ll send them in every so often. I hope the discrepancies in calcium levels get worked out, and I hope it’s not me, it’s them, regarding the K levels.
The next submission should be interesting - I’ve been dosing the Power Trace 4 for the last couple weeks. Currently only dosing 10% of the recommended amount, but will be sure to note where I am with those on the next submission to AWT. I think “flabbergasted” won’t even begin to describe a report of lower levels of those elements I’m adding daily…
My dad loaded the front of my pinewood derby car with ball bearings. Won medals 2 years in a row! lol
We loaded the back - gave the weight longer travel time on the down slope, then inertia would take over when it hit the flat run. That, coupled with molybdenum on the wheels…. - f’in smoked ‘em lol. Wanna race?
I wonder if our medals are going to be revoked now that we’ve come clean…?!
CHEATERS!
…I machined the wheel so they were perfectly smooth and then polished the axels. Yeah I’ve a got a few medals too
Hi, have you seen this post? http://www.mbenassireef.com/?cat=17
English is “altavista” english, but I think readable
I have done some comparative between Elos and Salifert, but only this is in english… (please scroll down) http://www.danireef.com/2007/11/17/test-per-acquario-viii-aquarius-tests-kit-viii/
I would like to have AquariumWaterTesting.com also in italy
See you
Danilo
http://www.DaniReef.com
Thanks for the link Danilo! I had not seen that. Fortunately I can read enough Italian that it’s easier than the Babelfish english translations :).
I am not at all surprised about the PO4 or NO3 readings on Salifert kits compared to Elos. I currently use DD Merck for PO4, but used to use Salifert, and the Salifert always shows ZERO PO4. It just doesn’t register low values I think.
As far as the NO3 - very interesting, because I only have a Salifert, and it always shows 0 NO3. I think I’ll pick up an Elos on my next order…! Wonder what my NO3 really is?!?!?!?!
The Tropic Marin seem to be pretty good too, no? I’ve never used one, but by the results from the link, they seem to read in line with the Elos (which I do trust and think are great kits), albeit not as consistent as Elos.
I think AWT is a good service, but would never rely on any of the results without having the same kit at home. My K+ readings were of a little concern. They seem to report to many people that K is low. But on my Fauna Marin Kalium test kit, potassium levels are a bit over NSW in the tank (and I do dose K), and my K levels in freshly mixed salt are over 350 (AWT told me it was under 300…)…. so for sure, cum grano salis.
Thanks for the links!
always “cum grano salis”… for every thing into the life
Danilo
http://www.DaniReef.com
[...] quite a lack of updates on StonyReef. Aside from daily kH checks, I haven’t tested my water since early April, nor have I done so much as a water change since mid-April. That said, my tank is looking as good [...]